Posts
In response to the 8/17/17 post, "The Angry Dinosaur," an
angry reader writes…
You, good sir, are out of touch with
reality. Come down out of that ivory tower and get down in the trenches with
us, and I guarantee it will not take you long to see that this teacher (the one
who wrote the newspaper article) is spot-on. We may indeed graduate a higher
percentage of students today, but at what cost? We have lowered the bar so much
that they are, in fact, not ready for college or careers. Certainly, there are
the exceptions, thank God. But secondary institutions all over the country are
shuttling more and more students who enroll in freshman level courses off to
remediation. Are you familiar with the TSI test? It is designed to flag those
students who do not have the basic reading and/or mathematics skills necessary
to be successful (aka "pass") a college freshman level course. In the
"good ol' days", as you call them, that was part of simply graduating
from high school. We did not hand everyone a diploma for occupying a seat in a
high school classroom for four years.
SC Response
Though your anger and defensiveness are predictable, you
really ought to do your homework before you fire off the angry email. I don’t work in an ivory tower. I’m in the field almost every day. Not at a single campus, but at campuses
across the country. From the most striving schools in the toughest of urban settings to
the highest achieving schools in the most affluent zip codes. But for every day spent at an affluent
school, I spend five at schools with the greatest need. So, I can assert
without question that you and the teacher who wrote the original article are
wrong in your assessments.
The bar for student success has not been lowered. It has been raised. And even with this raised
bar more students than ever before succeeding. What has changed from back in the “bad ol’
days” of education is that we no longer aggressively run off the students who do not fit in the predominantly middle-class school culture. That practice was reprehensible… And the
evolution away from that practice should be applauded.
Do colleges have to provide more remedial courses than in
past eras? Yes. But that is not an
indictment of today’s school. Instead, it is a badge of honor. The high schools
of past generations would sort students into College material and Not College
material. Then the system would remove from high school the “NOT” group with
brutal efficiency. Today’s schools keep teaching students from both groups. By
not giving up on tough to reach students, today’s educators position any
student completing high school with a realistic option of attending college.
This is a good thing.
Because, do you
know what you call a student who took remedial courses and an extra two years
to complete their college degree?
A College Graduate.
With all due respect, please do the profession, your
students, and yourself a favor. Change your attitude or retire. Because at this time your belief system is
not good for children.
Think.
Work. Achieve.
Your turn...
- Call Jo at (832) 477-LEAD to order your campus set of “The Fundamental 5: The Formula for Quality Instruction.” Individual copies available on Amazon.com! http://tinyurl.com/Fundamental5
- Upcoming Conference Presentations: TASSP Assistant Principal Workshop (Keynote); NASSP National Principals Conference
- Follow Sean Cain and LYS on www.Twitter.com/LYSNation and like Lead Your School on Facebook
