A new report from, The Alliance
to Reclaim Our Schools (AROS), outlines a five-part plan for improving
schools. As a former urban teacher
and principal, here is my critique and suggestions.
1. AROS: A challenging curriculum; including access to honors courses,
services for English-language learners and special education students, GED
preparation, and job training.
SC: More important than a challenging curriculum is an aligned
curriculum. Aligned to the
learning standards of the state. In Texas, teaching the TEKS at the required
rigor is challenging. To not teach
the TEKS is a disservice to any student, but especially to the at-risk
student. The same dynamic is true of
states that have adopted the Common Core.
I agree that access to honors courses is important, but without proactive leadership this will simply add to the all too common practice of using honors courses to segregate affluent
students from poor students. Which in a word is... Repugnant.
I agree that we can do a much better job of serving our special needs
students but will add that we must address the fact that we are significantly
over-referring poor students to special education.
GED preparation is simply a short-term solution that addresses the wave
of under-educated students that we have ignored for multiple years. The long-term solution is to improve
the quality of education provided to students which in turn reduces the number
of student who need to take the GED.
Career ready / college ready graduates from high school, every high
school, must be the norm, not the exception.
2. AROS: Emphasis on quality teaching instead of high-stakes testing.
SC: A high stakes test aligned to state standards is not the
enemy. And it is high quality,
aligned instruction (over time) that prepares students to be successful on any
aligned test. The issue is that
those in charge of testing policy equate raw test scores with academic
success. Raw test scores are
primarily a factor of family wealth.
The bottom line is that better instructional staffs and their schools measure
performance. Weaker staff and
their schools make excuses.
3. AROS: Support services available to the school and surrounding
community.
SC: I agree with this, in theory.
The more impoverished the community, the more external support (state
and district) the campus requires to compete on an equal footing. However, I have yet to
witness this implemented, at scale, with any true success.
4. AROS: Positive discipline practices, including social and emotional
learning supports.
SC: I agree with this, but not for conventional thinking of “these kids are bad” reasons.
Students at urban schools are not “bad.” If anything, they are justifiably wary
of institutions and unfamiliar with middle-class language and expectations.
Campus-wide social skills programs, coaching, and modeling better prepare poor
and urban students to “code-switch” as they transition from poor to middle
class settings and environments, often multiple times a day.
5. AROS: Improved parent and community engagement.
SC: As is generally the case, AROS is confusing leading and lagging
indicators. Improves parent and
community engagement does not make a better school. A better school improves parent and community engagement.
Think. Work. Achieve.
Your turn...
- Call Jo at (832)
477-LEAD to order your campus set of “The Fundamental 5: The Formula for Quality Instruction.” Individual copies
available on Amazon.com! http://tinyurl.com/Fundamental5
- Now
at the Apple App Store: Fun 5 Timer (Fundamental 5 Delivery Tool); PowerWalks
CLC (Networked Formative Observation Tool)
- Upcoming Presentations: Illinois ASCD Fall Conference (Multiple Presentations),
Texas Elementary Principals and Supervisors Association Fall AP Conference, The
Fundamental 5 National Summit (Multiple Presentations); American Association of
School Administrators Conference; National Association of Secondary School
Principals Conference (Multiple Presentations)
- Follow
Sean Cain and LYS on www.Twitter.com/LYSNation and
like Lead Your School on Facebook
Posts
