Above is a TV segment on the success of Game On! at an elementary school in Irving, Texas.
How's that for excitement?
Think. Work. Achieve.
Your turn...
Located at the Intersection of Theory & Practice
Above is a TV segment on the success of Game On! at an elementary school in Irving, Texas.
How's that for excitement?
Think. Work. Achieve.
Your turn...
In response to the post, “Mythology” a reader writes:
I enjoyed this article. Student engagement and purposeful talk are an informal way of assessing "who gets it and who doesn't" in a jiffy. Most students lack descriptive words in their speech and can no more write than speak appropriately. They use the same words over and over again. This is my second year to use purposeful talk and the more I use it the more I learn about our society: There is no one for many of our students to talk to at home, therefore, our students have TV language and their cognitive language is lacking. It is so difficult for them to speak about a science experiment we just completed. Consequently, I end up doing the same experiment until they have the vocabulary to speak about it. The most interesting conclusion - now the student can talk about it at home. I wanted to share and agree with your article.
SC Response
Thank you for sharing and thank you for validating the power of this Fundamental 5 practice. You are correct in pointing out that in many households, for any number of reasons, our students get little opportunity to converse. Much less, converse about academic topics. The more we model this behavior and provide students frequent opportunities to practice, the more our students blossom and begin to enjoy learning. Plus, as the teacher you get the added benefit of being able to sneak in a little rigor and relevance on the fly.
Think. Work. Achieve.
Your turn...
I was recently working with a group of special education teachers at an alternative school. My purpose, to help them better organize their instructional day to make them more effective and increase student performance. Of course this was going to require a little extra time in the short run, as they learned to plan differently. But in the long run, even if no time were saved (very unlikely), their stress level would be dramatically reduced.
You would have thought that I personally slapped every one of them. They immediately started in with, “Our kids are tough. We have to individualize. We have too many preps. We have too much paper work. We have families. We have lives, etc, etc.”
All true, yet not a bit of it matters. If you are a teacher, to do your job well, you will work about 60 hours a week. How you spend that 60 hours depends on what setting you are in, but the hours remain constant. See the chart below:
| | Secondary | Elementary | Alternative |
| Teaching | 36 | 36 | 36 |
| Planning | 6 | 8 | 9 |
| Grading | 12 | 10 | 4 |
| Meetings & Duties | 6 | 6 | 11 |
If you don’t like the mix, switch settings. If you don’t like the hours, you have to ask yourself, “Is teaching my avocation, or my vocation?”
If it is your avocation, the hours are just part of the price you pay to do something that you love and that matters. If it is your vocation, there are easier ways to make a living, and in many cases the pay is better.
Think. Work. Achieve.
Your turn...
I recently visited two campuses that are arguably doing a number of things well and are experiencing improved student performance. But sometimes habit and lack of confidence trip up even the most proactive educators. Case in point.
For three straight days, these two campuses gave benchmark tests to their students. Which means that instruction shut down for three straight days. However both of these campuses are in a district that administers regular (every 6 to 9 weeks) common assessments and both campuses administer their own three-week common assessments.
I asked both principals if they thought that the benchmark tests would provide any information that was not already provided by the assessments that they already administer. The answer from both of them was, “Not really.”
So I asked them why they were administering the benchmarks. Both said that the staff felt it was important to see how the students would perform on a longer test. I won’t say that this is completely wrong. However, there is no question that both campuses paid a high instructional price for information that is probably redundant.
Every minute spent testing is a minute subtracted from instruction. Therefore, you must weigh the value of the information gleaned against the value of instruction lost. If the value of the information is negligible or redundant, don’t test; teach.
And just because everyone else is taking long tests (and then not adjusting) doesn’t make it a good idea.
Think. Vote. Achieve.
Your turn...