Top LYS Tweets from the Week of December 25, 2011

For those of you who are keeping track, here are the Top 10 LYS Tweets from the week of December 25, 2011, as tabulated by the accountants at Price Waterhouse.

1. Who is surprised that the same politicians that enacted laws that prevent educator double-dipping, are double-dippers?

2. Presidential candidates aren't going near public education in the debate. Certainly not in their talking points for votes. Perry particularly silent. (By @tlongnecker)

3. Public education funding is broken across the nation. Maybe the presidential candidates are Waiting for Superman. *Sigh* (by @tlongnecker)

4. Paying teachers 10% more results in 5-10% higher pupil performance in OECD countries, find two professors. (By @FareedZakaria)

5. BRILLIANT: Babies can tell if adults are reliable or unreliable, and they choose to learn form the reliable ones. (By @anniemurphypaul)

6. BRILLIANT: Male college students’ grades drop in the fall if their school’s football team is winning lots of games. (By @anniemurphypaul)

7. BRILLIANT: A mistake is not a blunder to be regretted, but a welcome indication that you're out of your comfort zone. (By @anniemurphypaul)

8. Thirty major corporations paid zero federal income taxes in the last 3 years. (By @thinkprogress)

9. Mentally ill flood emergency rooms as U.S. states cut services. (By @Reuters)

10. I love a New Year! Clean slate: Winning is a choice. Choose to do the tough things that cause you to win!!! (By @DaveRamsey)

Think. Work. Achieve.

Your turn...

• Call Jo at (832) 477-LEAD to order your campus set of “The Fundamental 5: The Formula for Quality Instruction.” Individual copies available on Amazon.com! http://tinyurl.com/4ydqd4t
• Follow Sean Cain and LYS on www.Twitter.com/LYSNation
• Get the Fundamental 5 Lesson Plan App at the App Store – Fun 5 Plans
• Confirmed 2012 Presentations: Oklahoma Association of Elementary School Principal’s Mid-Winter Conference; Region 16 ESC Leadership Academy (Keynote Address); NASSP Conference; NASB Conference

Improving America's Schools - Letter 1, Part 3 (Professional Pay)

The following post is based on thoughts related to:


Letters to the editor that the NY Times has recently received concerning public schools. The link is: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/17/opinion/l17educ.html?emc=eta1

Jacqueline Ancess writes, “In education, research on performance pay shows no substantive gains in student achievement, and all Mr. Obama’s policy will do is reinforce the ill-conceived notion that low-level standardized tests are a valid measure of student achievement. Instead, pay teachers a salary that signals teaching as a profession.”

The above comment has three areas that I want to address, performance pay, measuring student achievement, and professional pay. I discussed performance pay and measuring student achievement in my previous posts. Now I will discuss professional pay.

Ms. Ancess does not believe that teachers are paid as professionals. I have to disagree. Teachers are paid as professionals. Starting salaries are competitive with the starting salaries of a number of professions in both the public and private sector. Obviously, things begin to change after the first couple of years, or do they? Teachers have traded income for security and fringe benefits. Even with districts laying off staff all over the country, right now teachers are at less risk of losing their job than people in other professions. Teacher retirement packages (we still have one) are safer than other professions. And teachers are generally less accountable for their personal performance than other professionals. The removal of these risks has a cost. As for fringe benefits, teachers enjoy more time off, more generous sick leave policies and fewer working hours than most professionals. These too have a cost.

So when you look at the total compensation package, teachers are not as bad off as we are lead to believe. You won’t get rich teaching, but were any of us called to this profession for the pay?

T.W.A – Your turn…