The following is a reprint of a
letter written by Texas State Board of Education Member, Thomas Ratliff (R) to
the his constituents. It is a
great document that cuts through the lies and half-truths about education that are dominating the rhetoric of campaigning politicians.
We’re Asking The Wrong Questions
“If they
can get you to ask the wrong questions, they don’t have to worry about their
answers.” This statement captures the rhetoric surrounding public
education in Texas.
President
John Kennedy, “To often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the
discomfort of thought.” This also captures the current rhetoric about
public education in Texas.
We hear
opinions like, “Our schools are low performing.” “Children are
trapped in low performing schools.” “Too many kids are not ready
for college.” “We are dumbing down standards.” “We
can’t keep throwing money at the problem.” “We spend too much
money on overhead and not in the classroom.”
These
“comfortable” opinions really don’t get anywhere close to the real challenges
facing our schools. So, what follows is a Q&A about Texas public
schools that, unfortunately, bring about the discomfort of the REAL challenges
facing our schools.
Q: How
many teachers are certified to teach the subject they are teaching?
A: Here’s
the breakdown of the percentage of teachers who are teaching a subject in which
he or she is NOT certified. They are called “Out of Field” teachers.
CTE – 37%
Computer Science – 48%
English – 24%
ESL – 50%
LOTE – 19%
Math – 21%
SPED – 60%
In other
words, students in Texas have, at best, a 1 in 5 chance of having a teacher in
their class that is not certified to teach that subject.
Q: Why
are there so few certified teachers in Texas classrooms?
A: There
are many answers to this question. College is too expensive and/or
student loans are too much to support on teacher’s salary. Teaching is
much different than it was due to discipline and funding issues. Teachers
aren’t valued and/or are blamed for problems in public schools today.
Keep in mind
that these numbers are actually lower unless you count “alternatively
certified” teachers, not just those graduating with a college degree in
teaching-related field of study.
Q: How
much money do schools spend on “overhead” instead of “in the classroom”?
A: First,
we have to come to an understanding about what’s “in the classroom” and what’s
not. Are counselors, nurses, librarians, bus drivers, cafeteria workers,
utility bills, gasoline, buildings, buses, or food considered “inside” or
“outside” the classroom?
Second, here
are the actual percentages from TEA’s 2012 Snapshot Report:
Central Admin. – 1%
Campus Admin – 3%
Support Staff – 9%
Teachers – 51%
Aides – 9%
Aux Staff – 27%
Central
admin: superintendent, business mgr., personnel mgr., etc.
Campus
admin: principals, asst. principals, athletic directors, instructional
director
Support
staff: counselors, librarians, diagnosticians (does not include
secretaries)
Aides:
interpreters, translators, aides that work under teacher’s direction
Aux.
staff: bus drivers, custodians, cafeteria, secretaries, etc.
Q: Why
do so many students need remediation during and after high school?
A: There
are at least three problems that impact this.
1.
Our
standards are too long. We are giving our students a “Wikipedia” or
“Cliff Notes” education. This teaches students to learn something long
enough to fill in a bubble sheet at the end of the school year, but they don’t
master or retain that information. For example, our math books cover 5
times more material than German or Japanese math books. Both countries
out-rank the US in math scores. Coincidence?
2.
As shown
above, there are too many teachers teaching subjects they aren’t certified to
teach. This impacts learning, period.
3.
Our
student body is increasingly economically disadvantaged. When programs
like Communities in Schools are cut back, kids suffer. Hungry kids aren’t
worried about their next test. They’re worried about their next meal.
What does it mean to be “economically disadvantaged? To receive a
FREE meal, a student must be from a family of four with an annual income of
$30,615 or to get a REDUCED PRICE meal, a student must be from a family of four
with an annual income of $43,568. There are other measurements as well.
This is the maximum income/family figure.
Q: How
does today’s statewide student body compare to 10 years ago?
A: The
student body is changing and the cost of educating the “average” student is
increasing. ESL and CTE kids cost more to educate. Don’t believe
me? Look at the school finance formulas. Those students are
“weighted” more than others due to the cost. Bottom line, school funding
challenges are getting worse, not better.
Hispanic +9% (51%/2.6M)
White -10% (31%/1.6M)
Eco. Dis. +10% (60%/3M)
ESL +3% (17%/850K)
CTE +3% (22%/1.1M)
Percent Tested +5% (69%)
SAT Avg. -9 pts (1600)
ACT Avg. +.3 pts (36)
Q: Are
children “trapped in low performing schools” in Texas? Would vouchers
help?
A: The
short answer is, “Yes there are low performing schools and yes, some children
are trapped there.” Now let’s fill in the blanks. In 1995, Texas established
the PEG (Public Education Grant) Program that allows students of low performing
schools to transfer to another public school district. Currently there
are 892 out of 8,529 (10.5%) campuses that are under the PEG program due to
underperformance on the state accountability system. This affects
approximately 300,000 students (6%). Why don’t they transfer or “escape”
these schools? There are many reasons: Lack of transportation,
their demographic sub-group may not be low-performing, work, family, community,
or available space at neighboring district, just to name a few.
A voucher is
a “false promise” to any child who doesn’t have transportation or the financial
resources to bridge the gap between the voucher and the total cost of tuition
at a private school. Additionally, a voucher can’t even begin to solve
the transportation, work, family, community or available space issues.
Q: Are
we really “throwing money at the problem” in public education?
A: No.
Our finance system has been found to be unconstitutional on all three
measures (inadequate, inequitable, and inefficient) for the first time ever.
Previous lawsuits have determined the state was only out of compliance in
one of the three measures.
Let’s look at
the number from the Legislative Budget Board.
In
inflation-adjusted dollars, the TOTAL (local, state and federal) funding per
student for public schools in Texas has decreased by 17% over the past 10 years
(from $7,222 in 2002 to $5,998 in 2013). This decrease is happening at
the same time our school population is getting more expensive to educate.
For example, the price of gas 10 years ago was $1.50, or less than 50% of
the current price.
Keep in mind
that Texas spends an average of $11,923 per prisoner to keep prisoners behind bars.
Which do you think is a better investment?
Q What’s
on the horizon?
A: We
will face a significant shortage of certified teachers in Texas if something
doesn’t change. This will have far-reaching ramifications across K-12
education and across the state. Consider the breakdown of the teacher
workforce today:
First year – 15,000
1-5 years – 93,000
6-10 years – 72,000
11-20 years – 86,000
20+ years – 58,000
Think. Work. Achieve.
Your turn...
- Call Jo at (832)
477-LEAD to order your campus set of “The Fundamental 5: The Formula for Quality Instruction.” Individual copies
available on Amazon.com! http://tinyurl.com/Fundamental5
- Call Jo at (832)
477-LEAD to order your campus set of “Look at Me: A Cautionary School
Leadership Tale” Individual copies available on
Amazon.com! http://tinyurl.com/lookatmebook
- Now
at the Apple App Store: Fun 5 Plans (Fundamental 5 Lesson Plan Tool); PW Lite
(Basic PowerWalks Tool); PW Pro (Mid-level PowerWalks Tool)
- Upcoming Presentations: TASSP Summer Conference (Multiple Presentations); NEASP
National Conference; The Fundamental 5 National Summit (Keynote Presentation)
- Follow
Sean Cain and LYS on www.Twitter.com/LYSNation and
like Lead Your School on Facebook
Posts
