In response
to the 1/16/2013 post, “Getting Rid of ISS – Part 1,” a reader writes:
SC,
I love the blog, your insights are educational, thought-provoking and on
point for this parent. But,
"...the best revenge on the student that demonstrates a disruptive
dislike for school and learning is to figure out ways to keep him in school and
teach him something. It’s the ultimate win/win for the adult and the ultimate
lose/win for the child."
I think you're leaving out the other "win/lose" on this--what
about the disruptive student's 22 or so classmates? One of those adult's wins
cheats the other students out of quality instructional time. That's worse than
a hollow victory.
Thoughts?
SC Response
Excellent counter-point. I wish you had included your name, because you
deserve a gold star!!!
There are students who successfully circumvent all the interventions and
supports that we are able to provide in a given instructional setting. When this happens, an objective, unbiased
administrator should first review the case to ensure that the adults dealing
with the student did not take any shortcuts and/or follow existing procedures.
For this does occur more often than we like to admit. If we find that the
adult(s) skipped a step, the student gets the benefit of the doubt and we work
with the adult. In systems with
poor oversight, you can safely assume that this occurs at least 10% of the time.
But let’s say the adults did everything they were supposed to do, then
the student should be removed and placed in a more restrictive
environment. Now it becomes a
numbers game. Think of the removed
student as a casualty. In any instructional setting, there will be casualties. If there are too many casualties then
another setting has to be created or the initial setting has to be modified.
When I was a teacher, the casualty numbers didn’t bother me, because I
didn’t think in those terms. My
job was to teach. When I was an
assistant principal the casualty number was a badge of honor, proof that I was
no-nonsense and supported my teachers. When I was a principal the casualty
number hurt my heart, because I saw where we had failed a student. When I went to central office, I saw the casualty number was
a function of our machine, so I modified the machine and the number of casualties
dropped dramatically.
I do recognize there is a point where the One is detrimental to the Many
so the One must go. However, I
also understand that adult practice drives student performance. And based on
that understanding I have learned that it is possible for a staff to get so
good at their practice that the casualty rate can be reduced to close to
zero.
Think. Work. Achieve.
Your turn...
- Call Jo at (832) 477-LEAD to order your campus set of “The Fundamental 5: The Formula for Quality Instruction.” Individual copies available on Amazon.com! http://tinyurl.com/Fundamental5
- Call Jo at (832) 477-LEAD to order your campus set of “Look at Me: A Cautionary School Leadership Tale” Individual copies available on Amazon.com! http://tinyurl.com/lookatmebook
- Now at the Apple App Store: Fun 5 Plans (Fundamental 5 Lesson Plan Tool); PW Lite (Basic PowerWalks Tool); PW Pro (Mid-level PowerWalks Tool)
- Upcoming Presentations: Texas Association of Secondary School Principals Conference (Multiple Presentations)
- Follow Sean Cain and LYS on www.Twitter.com/LYSNation and like Lead Your School on Facebook
No comments:
Post a Comment